GM May Be On To Something With Hybrid SUVs Blog Post at Automotive.com

Automotive Blogs

The Latest Coverage & News from Around the Industry

  
Blogs Widget

Add live, updating blogs on your desktop or webtop. Download our free widget.

GM May Be On To Something With Hybrid SUVs

Posted June 19 2007 12:59 PM by staff 
Filed under: Crossovers, SUVs, Hybrid


When Money magazine did a writeup recently of 13 fuel-efficient cars and trucks, they received more than their share of heated comments, not to mention some furrowed brows, from people who wondered why the magazine would tout such "great" mileage figures such as 16 mpg city, 24 mpg highway. That's great?



2008 gmc yukon hybrid front left.JPG

It is if you're running the numbers on an SUV, such as the GMC Acadia, which gets those mileage figures. Compare the Acadia to one of its stablemates, the GMC Yukon. Both SUVs have roughly the same amount of interior space for hauling things around, but the Yukon is the thirstier of the bunch -- it comes 'round the gas station more often, because it only gets 14 mpg in city driving, and a mere 19 mpg on the highway.

Big deal, you might say. So what's two miles per gallon in the city, anyway? They can't match a Civic Hybrid or even a Chevy Aveo in mileage. And even if you use a combined figure (averaging out city and highway mileage), there's still only a three-miles-per-gallon difference between the two vehicles.

Let's approach this from another angle: In a typical year's worth of driving, using 15,000 miles as an example, someone who drives an Acadia will consume 148 gallons less fuel than someone who drives a Yukon.

Now let's compare another set of cars -- say, a Nissan Altima, which comes in both regular and hybrid versions. A regular gas-engined Altima gets 26 mpg, and the hybrid version gets 34 mpg. That's a difference of eight miles per gallon. Surely that makes more of a difference than the paltry three miles per gallon difference of the large SUVs we mentioned, doesn't it?

Not if you factor in the amount of fuel used. If we use the same 15,000 miles per year traveled that we used in calculating the fuel usage of the SUVs, we find that by buying a Nissan Altima Hybrid, we'd only have saved 136 gallons of fuel a year over its non-hybrid variant.

True, the smaller cars save fuel in the long run, when compared with a large truck or SUV. But buyers of large trucks may need the large vehicles for specific purposes, and not just to look good while carrying the kids around town -- so they may never be in the market for a small vehicle. After all, if you've got a bunch of kids, two dogs, and you live where there's a couple of feet of snow in the winter, chances are you're going to go for the SUV and not a tiny little runabout.

Therefore, upcoming vehicles such as the Dodge Durango Hybrid or the GMC Yukon Hybrid (pictured), both due out this fall, will make an impact, because they will save fuel that otherwise would be guzzled by another large vehicle.



COMMUNITY COMMENTS
Edward A. Sanchez   (June 19 2007 12:49 PM)

Well, I think on a larger level, there needs to be a national re-evaluation of priorities, and if we "need" these behemoths. But we live in a free-market society, so I don't think it should be up to the government to mandate what we buy. However, offering consumers more choices is a good thing, and I'm sure many who like the size and capability of the GMT-900 SUVs will likely go for the hybrid option. Personally, I am awaiting the promised arrival of the new 4.5 liter turbodiesel V-8 that's coming for these pickups and SUVs.
 
Joel Arellano   (June 19 2007 12:58 PM)

personally i think the government should put more funding into public transportation systems. people will start using them as they tire of all their huge cars, traffic jams, and the tedium of driving. think of the impact, for example, of a 24-hour rail system between La-La land and Sin city!
 
ForgedInternals   (June 19 2007 01:21 PM)

IMO - its pretty lame that they would report any cars being efficient under 30 mpg!

But why not refer to the mpg of the civic hybrid, which gets 51, and non hybrid 40? 11 mpg can make a huge difference, but there are so many variables, all across the country.

- climate (Cold winters kill mpg)
- Traffic conditions (hybrids save a ton because they turn of while idling!)
- Elevation
 
ForgedInternals   (June 19 2007 01:22 PM)

btw, there should be a weight limit on passenger cars.

Lower weight = better mpg. 4500 pounds or under!
 
Add a Comment: (Must Be Registered)
User Name
Not Registered?    Signup Here
Password
 
Comment
(1024 character limit)